Skip over navigation
Banner
Industry
Directory Facilities Technology Transfer Economic Develop. AL BioHistory (TM)
Career
Job Search Post a Job Submit Resume Destination AL
News/Events
Local AL News Submit News Release Calendar Submit Event CEO Reading
Patient
Clinical Trials Local Support National Resources
Education
K-12 Higher Ed BioEd Reading
About
Advertising Feedback Home
 
About
 Advertising
 Feedback
 Home
Quick Links
 Directory
 Job Search
 Facilities
 Calendar
 Advertising
Community Service Ad:  Every Child Deserves a Chance to Play Baseball
Facilities
 
Events
 

NEW University of Washington Basic Bioscience Certificate starts Jan 2009


Opinion Poll: Is university and non-profit research institution technology transfer in Alabama excellent, just adequate or need major improvement?

Poll Results (September, 2006)

Yes: 92% (44)
No: 8% (4)

Select Comments

  • (IA) Really needs work. 'Need to convey the attitude: 'We're willing to work together and negotiate'
  • (OR) Oregon Universities do not protect the majority of research inventions. Those that are protected are not fairly valued in licensing discussions.
  • (WA) The University of Washington & Fred Hutch. are two of the larger reasons why Seattle will never be a biotechnology force. Both recieve more federal funding than any other institution other than Johns Hopkins. So, the need to partner with the private sector is limited.
  • (WA) Needs improvement.
  • (WA) Excellent but like many Washington State agencies is not funded from the correct source.

Back to Opinion Poll

 
Email thie page to a friend. Email This Page
to a Friend
Print this page. Print This
Page

© 2008 Info.Resource, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy . Terms of Use . Advisory Board . Advertising

AlabamaLifeScience.com is owned and published by Info.Resource, Inc..